<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Code Emporium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codeemporium.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codeemporium.com</link>
	<description>Coding eclecticism, and other large words</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 08:24:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Beautiful Souped Up &#8211; A Beautiful Soup GUI Utility to make Screen Scraping Even Easier by Bryce Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.codeemporium.com/2009/10/10/beautiful-souped-up-a-beautiful-soup-gui-utility-to-make-screen-scraping-even-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 08:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeemporium.com/?p=406#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

In terms of taking a website (e.g. one of the travel pages), scraping its content and converting it into a useful format (e.g. something suitable for the Kindle), Beautiful Souped Up really isn&#039;t the tool for the job.  The Beautiful Souped Up utility I&#039;ve written here really is aimed at programmers who are already familiar with the Python programming language and the Beautiful Soup software library.  

Beautiful Souped Up is just a tool that lets programmers meddle around a little with the page to figure out what code they&#039;d need to write to extract the pieces of the page they&#039;re after.  It doesn&#039;t do the other work required in a real screen scraper such as retrieving the page in the first place and converting the extracted pieces of text into an appropriate format.  For this reason, Beautiful Souped Up really isn&#039;t a complete screen scraping solution.  It just helps a little in the meddling stage.  The rest of the work requires a lot more Python code.  

Theoretically, using Beautiful Soup you could take whatever pieces of the webpage&#039;s HTML you&#039;re after and convert it whatever format you want, whether that be some format that lets you read it on the Kindle or some other format altogether.  Actually programming it to do such a thing however would be a fairly involved process, especially when the output has to be converted to comply with a specific format such as something suitable for the Kindle.  So unfortunately I can&#039;t be of much help given you&#039;re circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>In terms of taking a website (e.g. one of the travel pages), scraping its content and converting it into a useful format (e.g. something suitable for the Kindle), Beautiful Souped Up really isn&#8217;t the tool for the job.  The Beautiful Souped Up utility I&#8217;ve written here really is aimed at programmers who are already familiar with the Python programming language and the Beautiful Soup software library.  </p>
<p>Beautiful Souped Up is just a tool that lets programmers meddle around a little with the page to figure out what code they&#8217;d need to write to extract the pieces of the page they&#8217;re after.  It doesn&#8217;t do the other work required in a real screen scraper such as retrieving the page in the first place and converting the extracted pieces of text into an appropriate format.  For this reason, Beautiful Souped Up really isn&#8217;t a complete screen scraping solution.  It just helps a little in the meddling stage.  The rest of the work requires a lot more Python code.  </p>
<p>Theoretically, using Beautiful Soup you could take whatever pieces of the webpage&#8217;s HTML you&#8217;re after and convert it whatever format you want, whether that be some format that lets you read it on the Kindle or some other format altogether.  Actually programming it to do such a thing however would be a fairly involved process, especially when the output has to be converted to comply with a specific format such as something suitable for the Kindle.  So unfortunately I can&#8217;t be of much help given you&#8217;re circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beautiful Souped Up &#8211; A Beautiful Soup GUI Utility to make Screen Scraping Even Easier by Scott Zerby</title>
		<link>http://www.codeemporium.com/2009/10/10/beautiful-souped-up-a-beautiful-soup-gui-utility-to-make-screen-scraping-even-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Zerby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeemporium.com/?p=406#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Hi Bruce -

I am not a programmer but this code looks like it would make what i want pretty easy.  I am looking for a easy tool to scrape websites and convert them to something my Kindle can read.  

In particular I want to be able to scape VirtualTourist.Com on a particular city or country.

For example I am going to Hamburg in two weeks.  The page for info is:

http://www.virtualtourist.com/travel/Europe/Germany/Freie_und_Hansestadt_Hamburg/Hamburg-56480/TravelGuide-Hamburg.html

What would this look like after scaping in Beautiful Soup?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bruce -</p>
<p>I am not a programmer but this code looks like it would make what i want pretty easy.  I am looking for a easy tool to scrape websites and convert them to something my Kindle can read.  </p>
<p>In particular I want to be able to scape VirtualTourist.Com on a particular city or country.</p>
<p>For example I am going to Hamburg in two weeks.  The page for info is:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.virtualtourist.com/travel/Europe/Germany/Freie_und_Hansestadt_Hamburg/Hamburg-56480/TravelGuide-Hamburg.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtualtourist.com/travel/Europe/Germany/Freie_und_Hansestadt_Hamburg/Hamburg-56480/TravelGuide-Hamburg.html</a></p>
<p>What would this look like after scaping in Beautiful Soup?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Convincing .flac files to play in Windows Media Player 12 by Anthony dErcole</title>
		<link>http://www.codeemporium.com/2009/11/26/convincing-flac-files-to-play-in-windows-media-player-12/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony dErcole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeemporium.com/?p=462#comment-182</guid>
		<description>I checked again and some of my songs are under the artists name and some are still in the other files section. I&#039;ve tried that plug-in before and I don&#039;t think it fixed it either but I&#039;ll try again. Would be nice if it just worked out of the box. I would even pay a small fee to M$ if they would have full flac and other lossless support for WMP. I remember when XP came out I had to buy an mp3 decoder to use on WMP. Why can&#039;t they just offer that now? They know people would pay it. Too bad we can&#039;t sue them for their lack of support for an open source codec out the box. Say they are trying to monopolize with their own wma lossless. Or do you think we could???:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked again and some of my songs are under the artists name and some are still in the other files section. I&#8217;ve tried that plug-in before and I don&#8217;t think it fixed it either but I&#8217;ll try again. Would be nice if it just worked out of the box. I would even pay a small fee to M$ if they would have full flac and other lossless support for WMP. I remember when XP came out I had to buy an mp3 decoder to use on WMP. Why can&#8217;t they just offer that now? They know people would pay it. Too bad we can&#8217;t sue them for their lack of support for an open source codec out the box. Say they are trying to monopolize with their own wma lossless. Or do you think we could???:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Convincing .flac files to play in Windows Media Player 12 by Bryce Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.codeemporium.com/2009/11/26/convincing-flac-files-to-play-in-windows-media-player-12/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeemporium.com/?p=462#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Hi Anthony,

Yep, my .flac files show up with my regular artists files in media player.  I haven&#039;t tried WMP Tag Plus though (I&#039;m using the tag support plugin that I link to above in my post), so WMP Tag Plus may have something to do with your .flac files not showing up under artists on your machine.  All I can suggest is that you try the tag plugin I&#039;ve linked to above and see how that goes.

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Anthony,</p>
<p>Yep, my .flac files show up with my regular artists files in media player.  I haven&#8217;t tried WMP Tag Plus though (I&#8217;m using the tag support plugin that I link to above in my post), so WMP Tag Plus may have something to do with your .flac files not showing up under artists on your machine.  All I can suggest is that you try the tag plugin I&#8217;ve linked to above and see how that goes.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Convincing .flac files to play in Windows Media Player 12 by Anthony dErcole</title>
		<link>http://www.codeemporium.com/2009/11/26/convincing-flac-files-to-play-in-windows-media-player-12/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony dErcole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeemporium.com/?p=462#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Hey Bryce, I have Windows 7 64 bit on my machine and I&#039;ve never had a problem playing flac files and they are in my library on WMP 32 and 64 bit programs but they are in the other media section. I have WMP tag plus installed and Shark007 codecs for 32 and 64 bit installed. Do you actually have your flac files showing up with your regular artists files? That&#039;s what I&#039;m trying to do. I have wma, flac, and mp3 files on my machine and the wma and mp3 all show up in the library under the artists name but not the flac. any help would be appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bryce, I have Windows 7 64 bit on my machine and I&#8217;ve never had a problem playing flac files and they are in my library on WMP 32 and 64 bit programs but they are in the other media section. I have WMP tag plus installed and Shark007 codecs for 32 and 64 bit installed. Do you actually have your flac files showing up with your regular artists files? That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m trying to do. I have wma, flac, and mp3 files on my machine and the wma and mp3 all show up in the library under the artists name but not the flac. any help would be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I got Scammed, but at least they were good (kind of) by Bryce Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.codeemporium.com/2009/09/12/i-got-scammed-but-at-least-they-were-good-kind-of/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeemporium.com/?p=383#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Hi Julek,

I don&#039;t currently have the box with me and it&#039;ll be about a month before I do again.  I also don&#039;t have a legitimate boxed copy at the moment to compare against unfortunately.  The fake discs I got have Adobe graphics printed on them, though the quality of the graphics suggest that a fairly low-end printer was used; perhaps a sign of a fake.  For me the &quot;Serial Fix&quot; folder was the dead giveaway.  If you haven&#039;t already, I&#039;d take a look at the directory structure of your discs and see if there&#039;s anything equally as obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Julek,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t currently have the box with me and it&#8217;ll be about a month before I do again.  I also don&#8217;t have a legitimate boxed copy at the moment to compare against unfortunately.  The fake discs I got have Adobe graphics printed on them, though the quality of the graphics suggest that a fairly low-end printer was used; perhaps a sign of a fake.  For me the &#8220;Serial Fix&#8221; folder was the dead giveaway.  If you haven&#8217;t already, I&#8217;d take a look at the directory structure of your discs and see if there&#8217;s anything equally as obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I got Scammed, but at least they were good (kind of) by Julek</title>
		<link>http://www.codeemporium.com/2009/09/12/i-got-scammed-but-at-least-they-were-good-kind-of/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Julek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeemporium.com/?p=383#comment-174</guid>
		<description>You can buy such pirated software on dhgate dot com for $15 when you buy wholesale ;)
I sometimes buy software on eBay and I&#039;d like to know the difference between original and pirated Adobe software. 
Could you check the sticker on the box if there is something written that suggests that this software is pirated. 
Or maybe CDs have a label &quot;Made in China&quot;?

Can you see any difference from original software?

Thanks in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can buy such pirated software on dhgate dot com for $15 when you buy wholesale <img src='http://www.codeemporium.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I sometimes buy software on eBay and I&#8217;d like to know the difference between original and pirated Adobe software.<br />
Could you check the sticker on the box if there is something written that suggests that this software is pirated.<br />
Or maybe CDs have a label &#8220;Made in China&#8221;?</p>
<p>Can you see any difference from original software?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on .NET C# Wrapper for the ImageShack XML API by Bryce Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.codeemporium.com/2009/06/14/dot-net-c-sharp-wrapper-for-the-imageshack-xml-api/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeemporium.com/?p=15#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Hi Sathya,

Fantastic!  Glad to hear you were able to use the library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sathya,</p>
<p>Fantastic!  Glad to hear you were able to use the library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on .NET C# Wrapper for the ImageShack XML API by Sathya</title>
		<link>http://www.codeemporium.com/2009/06/14/dot-net-c-sharp-wrapper-for-the-imageshack-xml-api/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Sathya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeemporium.com/?p=15#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing the library Bryce.I wanted a simple, stupid, double-click and upload to Imageshack tool, couldn&#039;t find any so I set about building one for myself. Was struggling with how to send the requests, a bit of Googling led me here. Thanks to your library, I was successfully able to create the program. ( Refer : http://www.chip.in/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&amp;t=53184 )

Again, thanks a lot!
Cheers.
/SJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing the library Bryce.I wanted a simple, stupid, double-click and upload to Imageshack tool, couldn&#8217;t find any so I set about building one for myself. Was struggling with how to send the requests, a bit of Googling led me here. Thanks to your library, I was successfully able to create the program. ( Refer : <a href="http://www.chip.in/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&amp;t=53184" rel="nofollow">http://www.chip.in/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&amp;t=53184</a> )</p>
<p>Again, thanks a lot!<br />
Cheers.<br />
/SJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beautiful Souped Up &#8211; A Beautiful Soup GUI Utility to make Screen Scraping Even Easier by Zapping semanal &#8211; 48/53 &#124; THLopes</title>
		<link>http://www.codeemporium.com/2009/10/10/beautiful-souped-up-a-beautiful-soup-gui-utility-to-make-screen-scraping-even-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Zapping semanal &#8211; 48/53 &#124; THLopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeemporium.com/?p=406#comment-124</guid>
		<description>[...] Beautiful Souped Up &#8211; Uma ferramenta GUI para testar queries Beautiful Soup [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Beautiful Souped Up &#8211; Uma ferramenta GUI para testar queries Beautiful Soup [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
