<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I got Scammed, but at least they were good (kind of)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codeemporium.com/2009/09/12/i-got-scammed-but-at-least-they-were-good-kind-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codeemporium.com/2009/09/12/i-got-scammed-but-at-least-they-were-good-kind-of/</link>
	<description>Coding eclecticism, and other large words</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:31:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryce Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.codeemporium.com/2009/09/12/i-got-scammed-but-at-least-they-were-good-kind-of/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeemporium.com/?p=383#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Hi Julek,

I don&#039;t currently have the box with me and it&#039;ll be about a month before I do again.  I also don&#039;t have a legitimate boxed copy at the moment to compare against unfortunately.  The fake discs I got have Adobe graphics printed on them, though the quality of the graphics suggest that a fairly low-end printer was used; perhaps a sign of a fake.  For me the &quot;Serial Fix&quot; folder was the dead giveaway.  If you haven&#039;t already, I&#039;d take a look at the directory structure of your discs and see if there&#039;s anything equally as obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Julek,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t currently have the box with me and it&#8217;ll be about a month before I do again.  I also don&#8217;t have a legitimate boxed copy at the moment to compare against unfortunately.  The fake discs I got have Adobe graphics printed on them, though the quality of the graphics suggest that a fairly low-end printer was used; perhaps a sign of a fake.  For me the &#8220;Serial Fix&#8221; folder was the dead giveaway.  If you haven&#8217;t already, I&#8217;d take a look at the directory structure of your discs and see if there&#8217;s anything equally as obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julek</title>
		<link>http://www.codeemporium.com/2009/09/12/i-got-scammed-but-at-least-they-were-good-kind-of/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Julek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeemporium.com/?p=383#comment-174</guid>
		<description>You can buy such pirated software on dhgate dot com for $15 when you buy wholesale ;)
I sometimes buy software on eBay and I&#039;d like to know the difference between original and pirated Adobe software. 
Could you check the sticker on the box if there is something written that suggests that this software is pirated. 
Or maybe CDs have a label &quot;Made in China&quot;?

Can you see any difference from original software?

Thanks in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can buy such pirated software on dhgate dot com for $15 when you buy wholesale <img src='http://www.codeemporium.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I sometimes buy software on eBay and I&#8217;d like to know the difference between original and pirated Adobe software.<br />
Could you check the sticker on the box if there is something written that suggests that this software is pirated.<br />
Or maybe CDs have a label &#8220;Made in China&#8221;?</p>
<p>Can you see any difference from original software?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
